Annotation:Annotationen:The Construction of Knowledge/Kceifrus1i

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Annotationen:The Construction of Knowledge
Revision as of 15:19, 18 March 2020 by Admin (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Annotationen:The_Construction_of_Knowledge
Annotation Comment To me, therefore, time is not, as Prigogine said, an illusion. If I called the construct of time an illusion, the entire world that I know, the world that I live in, would also have to be called an illusion. And that is not the way I would characterize it. Although my entire world is a construction, I can still make a useful distinction in it between illusion and reality. But remember that for me “reality” always refers to experiential reality, not to the ontological reality of traditional philosophy. If we want to construct a rational reality for ourselves, time and space are indispensable building blocks, and I would rather call “illusion” any claim to knowledge beyond the field of

our experience.

Last Modification Date 2019-07-24T15:20:02.375Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Kceifrus1i","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ10Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","startOffset":1168,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ10Ӻ","endOffset":1971°Ӻ,"quote":"To me, therefore, time is not, as Prigogine said, an illusion. If I called the\nconstruct of time an illusion, the entire world that I know, the world that I live in,\nwould also have to be called an illusion. And that is not the way I would characterize\nit. Although my entire world is a construction, I can still make a useful distinction in it\nbetween illusion and reality. But remember that for me “reality” always refers to\nexperiential reality, not to the ontological reality of traditional philosophy. If we want\nto construct a rational reality for ourselves, time and space are indispensable building\nblocks, and I would rather call “illusion” any claim to knowledge beyond the field of\n\nour experience.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321075303603287898622":^°°,^"jQuery321075303603287898622":^°°Ӻ,"text":"To me, therefore, time is not, as Prigogine said, an illusion. If I called the construct of time an illusion, the entire world that I know, the world that I live in, would also have to be called an illusion. And that is not the way I would characterize it. Although my entire world is a construction, I can still make a useful distinction in it between illusion and reality. But remember that for me “reality” always refers to experiential reality, not to the ontological reality of traditional philosophy. If we want to construct a rational reality for ourselves, time and space are indispensable building blocks, and I would rather call “illusion” any claim to knowledge beyond the field of our experience.","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Schlussfolgerung3","data_creacio":1563974401725°