Annotation:Text:The Control of Perception and the Construction of Reality: Epistemological Aspects of the Feedback-Control System/Ltvvv5n42a
< Annotation:Text:The Control of Perception and the Construction of Reality: Epistemological Aspects of the Feedback-Control System
Revision as of 19:21, 11 June 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:The_Control_of_Perception_and_the_Construction_of_Reality:_Epistemological_Aspects_of_the_Feedback-Control_System |LastM...")
Annotation of | Text:The_Control_of_Perception_and_the_Construction_of_Reality:_Epistemological_Aspects_of_the_Feedback-Control_System |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2020-06-11T20:21:15.911Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ltvvv5n42a","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ34Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ35Ӻ","endOffset":889°Ӻ,"quote":"Traditionally, observations were taken as data to support or refute scientific theories. Similarly, perceptions were taken as data for supporting or refuting our view of the world. Contemporary scientific empiricism has reversed the role of observation and theory. A scientific theory establishes criteria which define what is to count as data or evidence. A global scientific; theory establishes a metaphysical system.\n\nSuch a system will, of course, be very “successful,” not, however, because it agrees so well with the facts, but because no facts have been specified that would constitute a test and because some such facts have even been removed. Its “success” is entirely man-made: it was decided to stick to some ideas, and the result was, quite naturally, the survival of these ideas. (Paul K. Feyerabend 1965, p. 178)\nThus within the framework of a scientific theory there are indeed facts. But these facts and the related scientific knowledge are theory-laden. They are incorrigible (in whatever sense of the word you want to adopt) only within the framework of the theory. They must stand or fall with the criterion for accepting or rejecting the theory. Insofar as that criterion is arbitrary, so are the facts of the scientific theory. Similarly, we reverse the roles of perception and the organization of the world. The higher-level organizing principles establish criteria which define what is to count as data or evidence. It is in this very sense that we decide to “stick to some ideas.” Within the framework of the organizing principles there are indeed veridical perceptions. But these veridical perceptions, and knowledge in general, are bound by our commitments – they are “organization-laden.”","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321065832023118483012":^°°,^"jQuery321065832023118483012":^°°,^"jQuery321065832023118483012":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1591899692870°
|
Thema | Wissen |
---|
Thema | Vorstellung |
---|