Annotation:Text:Problems of Knowledge and Cognizing Organisms/Vqw7vqxbam
< Annotation:Text:Problems of Knowledge and Cognizing Organisms
Revision as of 16:43, 16 July 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{WissenschaftlicheReferenz2 |field_radiobutton=Theorie }} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Problems_of_Knowledge_and_Cognizing_Organisms |LastModificationDate=2020-07-16T1...")
| Referenztyp: | Theorie |
|---|
| Annotation of | Text:Problems_of_Knowledge_and_Cognizing_Organisms |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | 2020-07-16T17:43:23.122Z |
| Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
| Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Vqw7vqxbam","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ19Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ19Ӻ","endOffset":810°Ӻ,"quote":"It is by no means easy to adopt this “radical constructivist” way of thinking (von Glasersfeld, 1974, 1975). Twenty-five centuries of epistemological efforts directed at demonstrating a correspondence between “knowledge” and an ontological reality are deeply ingrained in our languages and have been foisted on us from the moment we were born. From the theological thinkers of the Middle Ages to the iconoclastic children of our time, the claim has been “to tell it like it is” rather than to explain how we come to see it the way we do see it. The tradition is strong, often overpowering. Even in one’s own thinking, no matter how determined one may be to break away and start afresh, one inadvertently falls back into the conventional track and sees problems where there is no problem (Ceccato, 1966, p. 22).","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210354372536760819032":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1594914202994°
|
