Annotation:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior*/Obhgs3vbwe

From DigiVis
< Annotation:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior*
Revision as of 17:38, 26 February 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior* |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T17:38:36.977Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior*
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-02-26T17:38:36.977Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Obhgs3vbwe","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ14Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ14Ӻ","endOffset":1904°Ӻ,"quote":"An object, a cluster of sensory signals, now becomes a reference item in its own right. It sets up its own feedback loop, and this feedback loop, in the same “inductive” manner as the established ones, begins to select activities that are effective in transforming a somewhat different cluster of actual sensory signals (i.e., a “percept”) until it matches the reference item. In order to become a reference item, the object has to be cut loose from its original context where it was a more or less relevant sensory adjunct to an activity cluster, and it must become something very like a “representation”. This is the same development that every normal child goes through on his way to acquiring the concept of “object permanence”, when he begins to “externalize” his perceptual constructs Ӷ22Ӻ. Operationally this transfer is perhaps not so astonishing. The learning process already required that the organism be able to retrieve a recorded action program and to implement it in an effector channel as an actual activity. The transfer of a recorded cluster of sensory signals to a channel other than the one in which the cluster originated is no different in principle. The revolutionary aspect is that this cluster of sensory signals is now placed in the position of a reference value and that the feedback loop which it controls becomes a phase in the activity cycle of an already operating feedback loop. To use a fashionable word, it becomes “embedded” in another loop and, whenever it is called into action, its specific reference item temporarily supersedes the reference value of that other loop. \nDuBrul has expressed the same idea in somewhat different terms: “Information from a new monitoring feedback circuit has captured the final common path” Ӷ17Ӻ. He proposes a neurological hypothesis as to how such a development might come about. I am in no way competent to evaluate its plausibility.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321079218495795044192":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse","data_creacio":1551199109951°
Annotation of
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date
Last Modification User
Annotation Metadata
Annotation of
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date
Last Modification User
Annotation Metadata
Annotation of
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date
Last Modification User
Annotation Metadata