| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Rqpkqbg36a","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ2Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ21Ӻ","startOffset":119,"end":"/divӶ2Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ22Ӻ","endOffset":385°Ӻ,"quote":"Rather than believing that an idea, a chunk of “information”, or quite generally, a specific conceptual structure has been communicated from one person to another, we shall have to say that the listener or reader has generated a conceptual structure which, as far as we can see at the moment, seems to be compatible with the linguistic context, the situation in which it was uttered, and the model we have been able to construct of the other’s experiential world. This compatibility is, again, a fitting within constraints, and not a replica of what is in the other’s mind.\nFrom my point of view, then, what Bateson remarked about the theory of evolution is equally applicable to the construction of knowledge, to our acquisition of language, and to any interaction that we might want to call communication. None of these developments or activities can be explained in terms of causes, but we can go a long way towards explaining them in terms of constraints.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse","data_creacio":1551210301770°
|
