]> 2026-04-28T19:28:39+02:00 Annotation:Annotationen:Problems of Knowledge and Cognizing Organisms/Piuofyqopt 248 en ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Piuofyqopt","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ9Ӻ","startOffset":195,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ9Ӻ","endOffset":1112°Ӻ,"quote":"If “to know” is to make distinctions in experience and then to set up relations between the parts of experience that have been distinguished, it follows quite inescapably (1) that we can know ourselves only to the extent to which we experience ourselves, and (2) that the self we do experience and incorporate into our cognitive structures, by that very act of construction, ceases to be the self that does the experiencing. This constructive interdependence between observer and observed has not seemed palatable to the Western mind. Since the Greeks, circular arguments have always engendered a sort of horror infinitatis. Aquinas spoke of vicious circles. Yet, in the light of the preceding discussion, it should be evident that the shift in epistemology we have outlined also requires a proper rehabilitation of circularity or self-reference so that they can be included as legitimate ground in rational thinking.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210184030789652045672":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1594916587051° 2020-07-16T18:23:07Z 2459047.2660532 2020-07-16T16:23:08Z 2459047.1827315 Annotationen:Problems of Knowledge and Cognizing Organisms/Piuofyqopt