]> 2026-05-30T19:02:23+02:00 Annotation:Annotationen:The Construction of Knowledge/A9embs3k9v 248 en ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"A9embs3k9v","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ10Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ10Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":1168°Ӻ,"quote":"This construction of proto-space immediately raises a second question: What are\nthe items in it doing while one is experiencing other things? After all, a lot was going\non in one’s experiential world during the interval the abandoned items spent in their\nrepository. The language in which I am describing this, the words “while” and\n“during”, already give away the trick. The “being” of the things in the repository gets\nextended so that they can keep up with the flow of my experience and be available\nwhen my attention turns to them again. This parallelism of two extensions – the flow\nof a subject’s experience and the individual identities stretched over intervals in their\nrepository is what I call “proto-time”. It is the beginning of the concept of time. It is\ndifferent from the notion of proto-space because in it there are already the notions of\n“before” and “after”. But this “before” and “after” is constructed by the projection of\nthe subject’s experiences on things in the repository that are not in the field of\nexperience. It is, indeed, this parallelism that makes it possible to choose a standard\nexperience, for instance the movement of a clock’s hand, and to project it on some\nother experiential sequence as a measure of time.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321075303603287898622":^°°,^"jQuery321075303603287898622":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1563974409489° 2019-07-24T15:20:10Z 2458689.1390046 2019-07-24T13:20:10Z 2458689.0556713 Annotationen:The Construction of Knowledge/A9embs3k9v