]> 2026-07-27T08:12:26+02:00 Annotation:Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Kmtzjqdbph 248 en ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Kmtzjqdbph","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ8Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ8Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":451°Ӻ,"quote":"One of the revolutionary aspects of the constructivist approach to communication, then, is that it drastically changes the concept of “understanding”. There can no longer be the claim that the meanings of words must be shared by the users of a language because these meanings are derived from fixed, external entities. Instead, here once more, there is at best a relation of fit. That is to say, we tend to conclude that what we have said is understood by the listener if the way he or she reacts to our utterance seems compatible with our expectations. But as we discover only too often, what seemed understanding at first, disintegrates when a seemingly unproblematic utterance leads to quite unexpected reactions in a new situation.\nUnderstanding what other speakers mean by what they have said, therefore, cannot possibly be explained by the assumption that we have managed to replicate in our heads the identical conceptual structures they intended to “express”. At best we may come to the conclusion that our interpretation of their words and sentences seems compatible with the model of their thinking and acting that we have built up in the course of our interactions with them.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210429460049683836552":^°°,^"jQuery3210429460049683836552":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1580149853431° 2020-01-27T19:30:53Z 2458876.3131134 2020-01-27T18:30:55Z 2458876.2714699 Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Kmtzjqdbph