Difference between revisions of "Annotation:Text:Distinguishing the Observer: An Attempt at Interpreting Maturana/Klgknkzszm"
(Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Distinguishing_the_Observer:_An_Attempt_at_Interpreting_Maturana |LastModificationDate=2019-09-27T17:58:05.488Z |LastMod...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{TextAnnotation | {{TextAnnotation | ||
|AnnotationOf=Text:Distinguishing_the_Observer:_An_Attempt_at_Interpreting_Maturana | |AnnotationOf=Text:Distinguishing_the_Observer:_An_Attempt_at_Interpreting_Maturana | ||
| − | |LastModificationDate=2019-09- | + | |LastModificationDate=2019-09-27T18:15:31.397Z |
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
| − | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Klgknkzszm","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","endOffset":1008°Ӻ,"quote":"In an autopoietic organism, every perturbation, every experience, every internal event changes the structure of the network that constitutes the organism. These changes, of course, are not all of the same kind. Some could be the forming of new connections and thus of new pathways in the network; others could be what one might call “lubricating” or facilitating an already existing path. The observer, who speaks of re-living, must be able to distinguish a path that is being generated for the first time, from one that was connected at a prior occasion. This would seem necessary, regardless of whether the description concerns the operations of another organism or the observer him- or herself. But the repetition of an experience can be ascertained only if the observer is able, at least temporarily, to step out of the stream of experience, in order to distinguish the use of an already trodden path from the opening of a new one. In my terminology that means the observer must be capable of reflection.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210133245403116930342":^°°Ӻ,"text":" | + | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Klgknkzszm","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","endOffset":1008°Ӻ,"quote":"In an autopoietic organism, every perturbation, every experience, every internal event changes the structure of the network that constitutes the organism. These changes, of course, are not all of the same kind. Some could be the forming of new connections and thus of new pathways in the network; others could be what one might call “lubricating” or facilitating an already existing path. The observer, who speaks of re-living, must be able to distinguish a path that is being generated for the first time, from one that was connected at a prior occasion. This would seem necessary, regardless of whether the description concerns the operations of another organism or the observer him- or herself. But the repetition of an experience can be ascertained only if the observer is able, at least temporarily, to step out of the stream of experience, in order to distinguish the use of an already trodden path from the opening of a new one. In my terminology that means the observer must be capable of reflection.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210133245403116930342":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1569599885074° |
}} | }} | ||
{{Thema | {{Thema | ||
| − | |field_text_autocomplete= | + | |field_text_autocomplete=Erfahrung |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:15, 27 September 2019
| Annotation of | Text:Distinguishing_the_Observer:_An_Attempt_at_Interpreting_Maturana |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | 2019-09-27T18:15:31.397Z |
| Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
| Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Klgknkzszm","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","endOffset":1008°Ӻ,"quote":"In an autopoietic organism, every perturbation, every experience, every internal event changes the structure of the network that constitutes the organism. These changes, of course, are not all of the same kind. Some could be the forming of new connections and thus of new pathways in the network; others could be what one might call “lubricating” or facilitating an already existing path. The observer, who speaks of re-living, must be able to distinguish a path that is being generated for the first time, from one that was connected at a prior occasion. This would seem necessary, regardless of whether the description concerns the operations of another organism or the observer him- or herself. But the repetition of an experience can be ascertained only if the observer is able, at least temporarily, to step out of the stream of experience, in order to distinguish the use of an already trodden path from the opening of a new one. In my terminology that means the observer must be capable of reflection.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210133245403116930342":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1569599885074°
|
| Thema | Erfahrung |
|---|
