Annotation:Text:Hans G. Furth – Not Radical enough: A critique of von Glasersfeld’s Radical Epistemology/Ghe33h0wb3
< Annotation:Text:Hans G. Furth – Not Radical enough: A critique of von Glasersfeld’s Radical Epistemology
Revision as of 12:42, 17 January 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs)
| Annotation of | Text:Hans_G._Furth_–_Not_Radical_enough:_A_critique_of_von_Glasersfeld’s_Radical_Epistemology |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | 2020-01-17T11:42:25.690Z |
| Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
| Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ghe33h0wb3","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","endOffset":437°Ӻ,"quote":"((7)) E. von Glasersfeld’s notions of “protospace” (47) and “prototime” (48) seem to me intriguing allusions to Piaget's sensorimotor schemes, even as the distinction between recognition and recall (50) parallels Piaget’s differentiation between sensorimotor and mental object know-how. I agree with von Glasersfeld (51) that the clearest instance of the construction of a mental object is the formation of an internal image or a symbol.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32101117355615537122":^°°,^"jQuery32101117355615537122":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"ArgumentationFremd","data_creacio":1579257659547°
|
| Thema | Wissen |
|---|---|
| Bezieht sich auf Argumentation: | |
| Relation: | verträglich |
