Annotation:Text:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Vfnjaq1wld

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Text:Knowledge as Environmental Fit
Revision as of 14:00, 13 September 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Innovationsdiskurs2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Knowledge_as_Environmental_Fit |LastModificationDate=2019-09-13T14:00:20.722Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Ober...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:Knowledge_as_Environmental_Fit
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-09-13T14:00:20.722Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Vfnjaq1wld","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","startOffset":6682,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","endOffset":7296°Ӻ,"quote":"This at once brings us to one of the major discrepancies between the traditional and the radical constructivist theories of knowledge. Professional philosophers, as a rule, carefully exclude from their consideration anything that smacks of genesis or psychological development. They speak with disdain of the “genetic fallacy” and of “psychologism,” and thus, implicitly or explicitly, perpetuate the notion that the knowledge that is worth analyzing must be objective knowledge, and therefore independent of the particular knower’s mental operations and the circumstances under which he or she came to acquire it.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321072675465931287662":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1568376020334°
Innovationstyp Kritik am trivialen Konstruktivismus