Editing Annotation:The Construction of Knowledge/Kejl5y3gzn

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.

Latest revision Your text
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
|AnnotationOf=The_Construction_of_Knowledge
 
|AnnotationOf=The_Construction_of_Knowledge
|AnnotationComment=Wissenschaftliche Referenz
+
|LastModificationDate=2019-01-28T17:25:48.567Z
|LastModificationDate=2019-01-28T17:26:19.416Z
 
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Kejl5y3gzn","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","startOffset":2823,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","endOffset":3822°Ӻ,"quote":"Among others\nthere were thinkers like Gassendi and Mersenne in France, who argued that it was\nperfectly all right for science to make rational models, but they were always models of\nour experiential world and not models of a real world.\nThis separation of two kinds of knowledge – the rational and the non-rational –\nwas a novel idea in skepticism. If I have called the second “mystical”, some people\nmay think that I intend an evaluation, that I value the mystical less than the rational.\nThis is not so. In that regard I follow the first real constructivist, the Italian\nphilosopher Giambattista Vico, who contrasted the knowledge of reason and the\nknowledge of “poetic imagination” but did not question the value of both. He wrote a\nLatin thesis at the very beginning of the 18th century and called it “De Antiquissima\nItalorum Sapientia”. It is the first constructivist manifesto. Speaking about the real\nworld, Vico said very clearly that humans can only know what humans themselves\nhave made.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°,^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°,^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°,^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°,^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Wissenschaftliche Referenz","category":"Wissenschaftliche Referenz","data_creacio":1548692748263°
+
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Kejl5y3gzn","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","startOffset":2823,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","endOffset":3822°Ӻ,"quote":"Among others\nthere were thinkers like Gassendi and Mersenne in France, who argued that it was\nperfectly all right for science to make rational models, but they were always models of\nour experiential world and not models of a real world.\nThis separation of two kinds of knowledge – the rational and the non-rational –\nwas a novel idea in skepticism. If I have called the second “mystical”, some people\nmay think that I intend an evaluation, that I value the mystical less than the rational.\nThis is not so. In that regard I follow the first real constructivist, the Italian\nphilosopher Giambattista Vico, who contrasted the knowledge of reason and the\nknowledge of “poetic imagination” but did not question the value of both. He wrote a\nLatin thesis at the very beginning of the 18th century and called it “De Antiquissima\nItalorum Sapientia”. It is the first constructivist manifesto. Speaking about the real\nworld, Vico said very clearly that humans can only know what humans themselves\nhave made.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°,^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°,^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°,^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°,^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Wissenschaftliche Referenz","data_creacio":1548692748263°
 
}}
 
}}

Please note that all contributions to DigiVis are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see DigiVis:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)