Annotation:Annotationen:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation/Ptohla9ckc

Annotation of	Annotationen:Teleology_and_the_Concepts_of_Causation
Annotation Comment	Where evolution is concerned, then, there is no harm in using ‘purpose of’ as a descriptive tool, provided one does not mistake it for the purpose for, which would imply a guiding outside force that intentionally designed the thing one is describing.
Last Modification Date	2020-01-17T20:29:05.844Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ptohla9ckc","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ14Ӻ","startOffset":622,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ14Ӻ","endOffset":872°Ӻ,"quote":"Where evolution is concerned, then, there is no harm in using ‘purpose of’ as a descriptive tool, provided one does not mistake it for the purpose for, which would imply a guiding outside force that intentionally designed the thing one is describing.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210238226333597001072":^°°,^"jQuery3210238226333597001072":^°°,^"jQuery3210238226333597001072":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Where evolution is concerned, then, there is no harm in using ‘purpose of’ as a descriptive tool, provided one does not mistake it for the purpose for, which would imply a guiding outside force that intentionally designed the thing one is describing.","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Schlussfolgerung3","data_creacio":1579289345562°