Annotation:Annotationen:Why Constructivism Must be Radical/I8famzt2en

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Annotationen:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical
Annotation Comment Instead of “truth.” constructivism speaks of viability and compatibility with previously constructed models. In other words, scientific models are tools.
Last Modification Date 2019-09-20T19:16:10.167Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"I8famzt2en","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ3Ӻ","startOffset":539,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ3Ӻ","endOffset":692°Ӻ,"quote":"Instead of “truth.” constructivism speaks of viability and compatibility with previously constructed models. In other words, scientific models are tools.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32106017330199105162":^°°,^"jQuery32106017330199105162":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Instead of “truth.” constructivism speaks of viability and compatibility with previously constructed models. In other words, scientific models are tools.","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Schlussfolgerung3","data_creacio":1568999767129°