| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Yrxsd5vc8r","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ33Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/olӶ1Ӻ/liӶ3Ӻ","endOffset":139°Ӻ,"quote":"The sort of perturbations that lead to the accommodation of conceptual structures are perturbations that arise in the context of a “scheme. ” A scheme is a triadic arrangement consisting of an initiating situation (which may be perceptual or conceptual), an activity or operation, and an expected outcome or result (von Glasersfeld, 1979). According to the original scheme theory, there are three main causes of perturbation: \n\nA situation is recognized as instantiation of one that has been associated with a particular action, the action is carried out, and the expected result fails to be experienced. (Note that the “recognition” of the trigger situation is where “assimilation” plays its part.) This first kind of perturbation, that is, the failure to produce the expected result, will most frequently lead to an accommodation of the recognition procedure.\nIf the scheme, as described in (1), produces, instead of the accustomed result, another result that turns out to be desirable, this may lead to differentiation in the initial situation or in the activity and thus to the construction of a new scheme which will then be expected to produce the new result.\nA different activity, associated with a different situation, leads to a result that is recognized as the expected result of another scheme.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321054503532549951172":^°°,^"jQuery321054503532549951172":^°°,^"jQuery321054503532549951172":^°°,^"jQuery321054503532549951172":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1560417512294°
|
