| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ssbbbrvdj8","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ22Ӻ","startOffset":310,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/blockquoteӶ5Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":712°Ӻ,"quote":"Gerhard Roth’s precise formulation may serve as an example.\n\nThe conception of such a cyclical theory raises the problem of the foundation and of the beginning. Either one begins with the epistemological explication concerning the observer, the conditions and the objects of his observations (distinction of objects, system-parts, etc.) in order, then, to reach a constructivist theory of living systems; or one begins with an objectivist explanation of the organisation of living systems which then leads to a theory of the brain, of cognition, and eventually to a theory of the observer. Maturana attempts both simultaneously ...\nThis conception must fail, because it gets entangled in the contradiction between the constructivist and the objectivist approach.Ӷ11Ӻ (p.88)","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321077157362950965542":^°°,^"jQuery321077157362950965542":^°°,^"jQuery321077157362950965542":^°°,^"jQuery321077157362950965542":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1569604118340°
|
