Annotation:Text:The Concepts of Adaptation and Viability in a Radical Constructivist Theory of Knowledge/Gb8fbiny9w

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:The_Concepts_of_Adaptation_and_Viability_in_a_Radical_Constructivist_Theory_of_Knowledge
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-07-02T19:41:44.866Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Gb8fbiny9w","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ17Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ17Ӻ","endOffset":722°Ӻ,"quote":"If we can accept this view of inductive inference as the establishing of regularities that survive and remain viable as long as our experience does not falsify them, and if we conclude that, by and large, we have no better way of explaining, predicting, and governing our experience, then we can take one further step that is relevant to the problem involved in what Piaget (1975) has called equilibration majorante, i.e., the incremental equilibration that proceeds in spirals, incorporating more and more items and events in the developing organism’s experience. This constitutes a problem because of the tacit assumption that such an effort of incrementation could be explained only by some specific form of motivation.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210398585167170416032":^°°,^"jQuery3210398585167170416032":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1562089304527°
Innovationstyp Akzeptieren neuer Erkenntnisse