Annotation:Text:The Logic of Scientific Fallibility/Qln9dfa5e4

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:The_Logic_of_Scientific_Fallibility
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2020-01-29T14:38:28.484Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Qln9dfa5e4","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ32Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ33Ӻ","endOffset":64°Ӻ,"quote":"Conventional psychologists have tried to make hay of that apparent paradox— and they have succeeded whenever they were able to obscure the fact that, in Piaget’s theory, assimilation always goes together with accommodation. They frequently announced that if the notion of assimilation were correct, infants could never acquire new behaviors or new ideas.\nLet me try to correct this misinterpretation as simply as I can.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1580305108114°
Innovationstyp Missverständnisse aufzeigen