| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Sbzwcm08s2","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ42Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ44Ӻ","endOffset":573°Ӻ,"quote":"As Hume clearly saw, this involves the belief that the real world is essentially an orderly world in which events do not take place randomly. A hundred years after Hume, this was expressed very beautifully by the German scientist von Helmholtz, when he wrote in 1881:\n\nIt was only quite late in my life that I realized that the law of causality is nothing but our presupposition that the universe we live in is a lawful universe.Ӷ7Ӻ\n\nThat is to say, we expect the world we live in to be a world in which there are certain regularities, a world that runs according to certain rules. Since scientists call some of these regularities “Laws of Nature,” it may not be a silly question to ask how we come to know, or how we construct regularities?\nLet me return to Maturana’s methodology: The second step in his break-down, was relating observations, and relating them in such a way that one comes up with a Model. A scientific model, of course, is no more and no less than the crystallization of specific regularities. In order to speak of specific regularities, one must be fairly precise about the events that are claimed to be regular. That is to say, one must define certain experiences so that one can recognize them when one experiences them again. There can hardly be regularity before one has noticed repetition.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1580306493851°
|
