Annotation:Text:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Tuj5zod0gm

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2020-01-27T18:29:37.544Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Tuj5zod0gm","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ25Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ25Ӻ","endOffset":952°Ӻ,"quote":"The example of the child’s “inappropriate” use of the word “dog” that leads to a perturbation and leads to an accommodation and to the formation of a new conceptual structure to associate with the word “lamb” is not very different from a dancer making an “inappropriate step, treading on his partner’s toes, and consequently modifying his motor pattern. In the case of the child’s vocabulary, the experiential sequence of accommodation triggered by the unsuccessful use of a word, provides a model, at one and the same time, for the acquisition of new concepts and for the construction of lexical meaning. Without going into the details of the process that links the experience of a thing with the experience of a word, it should be clear that both these items are composed of elements that are part of the acting subject’s experiential world and are, therefore, determined by what the subject attends to and how the subject perceives and conceives it.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321049035480219443762":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1580146177272°
Thema Anpassung
Thema Erfahrung