| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"M481z8uurk","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ9Ӻ","startOffset":2013,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/h3Ӷ6Ӻ/spanӶ2Ӻ/spanӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":0°,^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ","startOffset":18264,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ10Ӻ","endOffset":735°Ӻ,"quote":"Let us\nassume that I was here yesterday and, just as now, had a glass of water in front of me.\nI come in today and say: “Oh, this is the same glass, the identical glass that stood here\nyesterday.” If someone asked me, how I can tell that it is the identical glass, I should\nhave to look for a particular that distinguishes this glass from all others. This may turn\nout to be impossible. But this is not the problem I want to focus on.\n\nTime and Space / There is another conceptual problem that is difficult for adults to see, because it was\nsolved in an ingenious way at a very early age. I am claiming that the glass I see now is\nthe self-same individual that I saw yesterday, but I did not see it during the entire\ninterval of 24 hours. During that interval this glass was not part of my experiential\nworld and my attention was on other things, and for a third of the interval I was\nasleep. Yet, I want to say this is the self-same, identical glass. This would require that\nthe glass had some form of continuity outside my experiential world. Therefore there\nmust be some place beyond my field of experience where the glass could be while I\nwas busy experiencing other things or asleep.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321071718277815449762":^°°,^"jQuery321071718277815449762":^°°,^"jQuery321071718277815449762":^°°,^"jQuery321071718277815449762":^°°,^"jQuery321071718277815449762":^°°,^"jQuery321071718277815449762":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Es muss einen Ort außerhalb des eigenen Erfahrungsbereichs geben, in dem Dinge sein können, wenn sie nicht erlebt werden.","category":"Argument","data_creacio":1560246158369°
|
