| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Q4d84gutnf","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ25Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ25Ӻ","endOffset":822°Ӻ,"quote":"Re-presentations play an important part in perception because they enable the perceiver to “recognize” items when only part of their necessary components is actually being perceived at the moment. Re-presentations make it possible to complete experiences so that they can be considered a repetition of a prior one, and they make it possible to conjure up, for instance, a visual experience when the visual field is blank. But – and I want to emphasize this – they can consist of nothing but experiential material which, in one form or another, they produce as a re-play. Thus, there is no basis for the assumption that re-presentations arise as internal images of an outside world; instead, it seems quite plausible that they constitute the material which the cognizing subject externalizes in the construction of reality.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321043505518398058112":^°,"sizzle1552325171671":^"undefined":^"parentNode":Ӷ127948,31,trueӺ°°°,^"jQuery321043505518398058112":^°,"sizzle1552325171671":^"undefined":^"parentNode":Ӷ125801,31,trueӺ°°°Ӻ,"text":"\nEs gibt keine Grundlage für die Annahme, dass Repräsentationen innere Bilder der Außenwelt sind, sie bilden aber das Material, das das erkennende Subjekt in der Konstruktion von Realität externalisiert","category":"Argument","data_creacio":1551716782674°
|
