Difference between revisions of "Annotation:Annotationen:Of Knowing, Telling, and Showing/Jbpgj2zryt"

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Of_Knowing,_Telling,_and_Showing |LastModificationDate=2019-09-27T19:56:20.984Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Obe...")
 
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|LastModificationDate=2019-09-27T19:56:20.984Z
 
|LastModificationDate=2019-09-27T19:56:20.984Z
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jbpgj2zryt","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":824°Ӻ,"quote":"My utterance (written, in this case) is not connected to a specific chain of action of mine nor with some manifest behavior I might expect of you. I used the sentence as an example to show the effect of language on the flow of your re-presentations. \nThe real power of language is this power to call forth re-presentations of past experience or what the language users have abstracted from it; and what one abstracts from one’s experience is “knowledge”. \nThis way of seeing “language” does several things. It makes clear that “to understand” is to be able to fit (more or less satisfactorily) re-presented abstracts of one’s own experience to another’s words that one hears or reads. If the composition one ends up with seems contradictory, one feels one has not understood, or that the other is in some way out of order.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32106422897215043282":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1569606980660°
+
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jbpgj2zryt","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":822°Ӻ,"quote":"My utterance (written, in this case) is not connected to a specific chain of action of mine nor with some manifest behavior I might expect of you. I used the sentence as an example to show the effect of language on the flow of your re-presentations. \nThe real power of language is this power to call forth re-presentations of past experience or what the language users have abstracted from it; and what one abstracts from one’s experience is “knowledge”. \nThis way of seeing “language” does several things. It makes clear that “to understand” is to be able to fit (more or less satisfactorily) re-presented abstracts of one’s own experience to another’s words that one hears or reads. If the composition one ends up with seems contradictory, one feels one has not understood, or that the other is in some way out of order.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32106422897215043282":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1569606980660°
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 08:31, 14 October 2019

Annotation of Annotationen:Of_Knowing,_Telling,_and_Showing
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-09-27T19:56:20.984Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jbpgj2zryt","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":822°Ӻ,"quote":"My utterance (written, in this case) is not connected to a specific chain of action of mine nor with some manifest behavior I might expect of you. I used the sentence as an example to show the effect of language on the flow of your re-presentations. \nThe real power of language is this power to call forth re-presentations of past experience or what the language users have abstracted from it; and what one abstracts from one’s experience is “knowledge”. \nThis way of seeing “language” does several things. It makes clear that “to understand” is to be able to fit (more or less satisfactorily) re-presented abstracts of one’s own experience to another’s words that one hears or reads. If the composition one ends up with seems contradictory, one feels one has not understood, or that the other is in some way out of order.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32106422897215043282":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1569606980660°