Annotation:Annotationen:Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position/Yg5uqza56s
< Annotation:Annotationen:Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position
Revision as of 13:53, 24 July 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Knowing_without_Metaphysics:_Aspects_of_the_Radical_Constructivist_Position |LastModificationDate=2019-07-24T14:53:0...")
Annotation of | Annotationen:Knowing_without_Metaphysics:_Aspects_of_the_Radical_Constructivist_Position |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2019-07-24T14:53:05.526Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Yg5uqza56s","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ","startOffset":335,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ","endOffset":996°Ӻ,"quote":"To give anything like a complete answer to this question, one would have to explicate at least all the key ideas of the constructivist approach I have listed above, and one would have to reiterate that constructivism deals with knowing not with being. There is no simple argument to justify the distinction between experiential reality and ontological reality. One might reply that life would be a lot easier if no one claimed to know the world as it is, and that the constructivist orientation is one way to avoid such claims. As a constructivist, I have never said (nor would I ever say) that there is no ontic world, but I keep saying that we cannot know it.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321000601467717208870052":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1563972784952°
|