Annotation:Annotationen:Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position/Ednhfpv2nd
< Annotation:Annotationen:Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position
Revision as of 13:58, 24 July 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Knowing_without_Metaphysics:_Aspects_of_the_Radical_Constructivist_Position |LastModificationDate=2019-07-24T14:58:1...")
Annotation of | Annotationen:Knowing_without_Metaphysics:_Aspects_of_the_Radical_Constructivist_Position |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2019-07-24T14:58:16.184Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ednhfpv2nd","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ7Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ7Ӻ","endOffset":1297°Ӻ,"quote":"Two aspects of this development are crucial for an understanding of Radical Constructivism. First, all this distinguishing and constructing of one’s ‘self’ takes place within the experiential field, uses elements of the sensory manifold, and is the result of the experiencer’s own actions. It does not require ‘things-in-themselves’ or ‘distinctions-in-themselves’ that could be ascribed to an objective, ontological reality. Second, what is isolated and established in this way, is the self one experiences – it is not that mysterious central entity that does the experiencing.\nThe constructs with which we have furnished our experiential world are those we have found useful or, at least, tenable. We use them in our schemes of action and in our conceptual operations; we drop or modify them if their rate of failure gets too high and we are able to construct more reliable ones; and we try to balance and coordinate them among each other. The more generally they are applicable, the less of them we need.\nAnd, given the variety of situations we come to distinguish, economy in the number of schemes becomes an important consideration.\n\nIn all this there is an aspect that was clearly stated by Piaget but was mostly ignored or misunderstood by both his followers and his critics.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321000601467717208870052":^°°,^"jQuery321000601467717208870052":^°°,^"jQuery321000601467717208870052":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1563973095678°
|