Annotation:Annotationen:The Constructivist View of Communication/G6p7dxu7ck
< Annotation:Annotationen:The Constructivist View of Communication
Revision as of 14:23, 24 July 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:The_Constructivist_View_of_Communication |LastModificationDate=2019-07-24T15:23:05.209Z |LastModificationUser=User:S...")
Annotation of | Annotationen:The_Constructivist_View_of_Communication |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2019-07-24T15:23:05.209Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"G6p7dxu7ck","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ","endOffset":765°Ӻ,"quote":"Linguists have only fairly recently used more descriptive terms such as “agent” and “patient”. The entities these terms designate were included in the large grammatical categories of subject and object. In linguistics, these terms refer to parts of a sentence and in no way to parts of anyone’s experience. Subject, verb, and object are syntactic terms and refer to the structure of sentences, not to the links we have created among the things we perceive and live with. It was a long-standing tradition in linguistics to separate syntax from semantics, as though the two domains had nothing to do with each other. In my view, it was this rigid separation that made it very difficult for linguists to develop a viable theory of language acquisition.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210270571429181588162":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1563974584665°
|