Annotation:Annotationen:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation/Qsvwuvnikb

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Annotationen:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation
Revision as of 13:56, 11 December 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Teleology_and_the_Concepts_of_Causation |LastModificationDate=2019-12-11T13:56:42.986Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sa...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Annotationen:Teleology_and_the_Concepts_of_Causation
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-12-11T13:56:42.986Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Qsvwuvnikb","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ5Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ5Ӻ","endOffset":670°Ӻ,"quote":"Two further points have to be made. The first is that Aristotle saw the premises of a syllogism as the material cause of the conclusion. This was his way of saying what logicians have reiterated ever since, namely that the deductive procedure does not generate new knowledge, but merely picks out or recombines elements that are already contained in the premises. (This, of course, in no way precludes the fact that the deductive procedure often brings out features of whose presence in the premises one was unaware.) \nThe second is that Aristotle, as we saw above, held that definitions are to be considered the formal cause of the entity that is defined.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321050015884186387442":^°°,^"jQuery321050015884186387442":^°°,^"jQuery321050015884186387442":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1576069002456°