Annotation:Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Zq5wuk01z0

Annotation of	Annotationen:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2020-01-27T18:25:42.041Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Zq5wuk01z0","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":614°Ӻ,"quote":"For the observing biologist, of course, this viability refers to the fit with an external environment. For the constructivist, whose interest is focused exclusively on the cognitive domain in which there is no access to an external environment, viability and fit must always refer to the cognizing subject’s experiential world.\nThis shift of meaning was most convincingly explained and demonstrated by Jakob von Uexküll in the early decades of this century. In his charming account (whose title was translated as Strolls through the environments of animals and menӶ5Ӻ), he showed that every living organism in fact creates two coordinated environments for itself: an environment of actions (Wirkwelt) and an environment of perception (Merkwelt). Both these environments are necessarily subjective, because the first depends on the particular organism’s capabilities of acting, and the second on the range of the organism’s sensory equipment.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321055324581089843172":^°°,^"jQuery321055324581089843172":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1580145941752°