Annotation:Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Z68fuipj6p

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking
Revision as of 18:33, 27 January 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking |LastModificationDate=2020-01-27T18:33:53.140Z |LastModificationUser=User...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Annotationen:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2020-01-27T18:33:53.140Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Z68fuipj6p","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ7Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ7Ӻ","endOffset":867°Ӻ,"quote":"However, even if we discount the philosophers’ objection, because it stems from a realist epistemology which we believe to have successfully dismantled, we shall have to explain how it comes about that, by and large, linguistic communication works fairly well. This successful functioning may seem surprising, given our assumption that meanings are subjective constructs. The constructivist answer to this question is very simple and derives directly from the basic assumption of the instrumentality of human action, be it physical, conceptual, or communicatory. Just as our concepts are shaped, modified, and discarded according to how well they serve us in our conceptual schemes, so the semantic connections between words and concepts are shaped and modified by success and failure in the continual social interactions with speakers of our language.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32106124452049874692":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1580146432833°