Annotation:Annotationen:The Logic of Scientific Fallibility/Mmh3lqqo2p
< Annotation:Annotationen:The Logic of Scientific Fallibility
Revision as of 13:54, 29 January 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:The_Logic_of_Scientific_Fallibility |LastModificationDate=2020-01-29T13:54:06.063Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah...")
Annotation of | Annotationen:The_Logic_of_Scientific_Fallibility |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2020-01-29T13:54:06.063Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Mmh3lqqo2p","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","startOffset":2971,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":4331°Ӻ,"quote":"I do not know whether, prior to this experience, hydrologists knew much about the balance of pressures on the level of the groundwater. They certainly had the theoretical equipment and the formulas to figure it out. Yet, they apparently did not do so before the Assuan Dam was built.\nWell, you may say, one can’t think of everything—the next time they’ll do better. I would agree with this. Scientists, engineers—even members of the medical profession— are capable of learning. But that is not the problem I have in mind.\nLearning is usually defined as “modifying a behavior or a way of thinking on the basis of experience,” and there is, of course, the implication that the modification is towards effectiveness, efficiency, or, at any rate, something that makes it easier to attain the chosen goal.\nI have no doubt that the next time a major dumping ground for radio-active waste is chosen and prepared, someone will think of the fauna and flora and of a way to keep them from spreading the poison. And when big dams were built after Assuan, someone, I’m sure, tried to work out how the water table in down-stream lands would be affected. Science and its professionals can, in fact, see more and further than the lay public—precisely because of the often uncommon experiences they have accumulated. The problem I have in mind is that they often do not look.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210112638862274719642":^°°,^"jQuery3210112638862274719642":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1580302445734°
|