Annotation:Text:Die Radikal-Konstruktivistische Wissenstheorie/Q1hflthahs

Annotation of	Text:Die_Radikal-Konstruktivistische_Wissenstheorie
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2020-01-30T09:41:18.610Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Q1hflthahs","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ389Ӻ","startOffset":691,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ389Ӻ","endOffset":1151°Ӻ,"quote":"That I have not forgotten the Statement that „action, not\nperception, is the key concept of an adequate theory ofkrtowl-\nedge“ ((8)) seems to me to be inherent in a number of things I\nsay. But FURTH is probably right: I should have explicitly\nmade it dear that I consider „perception“ not a passive re-\nceiving of data but an active construction on the pari of the\nperceiver. The Statement at the end of my first paragraph (EvG\n1) was obviously not sufficient.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32102414669047049782":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"AntwortGlasersfeld","data_creacio":1580373664046°

Thema	{{{field_text_autocomplete}}}Property "Ist Thema" (as page type) with input value "{{{field_text_autocomplete}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.
Bezieht sich auf Argumentation:	Annotation:Text:Hans G. Furth – Not Radical enough: A critique of von Glasersfeld’s Radical Epistemology/Ldrsftuahu
Relation:	verträglich

Property "Thema" (as page type) with input value "{{{field_text_autocomplete}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.