Annotation:Text:Radical Constructivism and Teaching/Hrgm50enu0

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Text:Radical Constructivism and Teaching
Revision as of 09:53, 22 June 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Innovationsdiskurs2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Radical_Constructivism_and_Teaching |LastModificationDate=2020-06-22T10:53:10.612Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:Radical_Constructivism_and_Teaching
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2020-06-22T10:53:10.612Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Hrgm50enu0","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ21Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ21Ӻ","endOffset":649°Ӻ,"quote":"This seems to me a good reason to take a brief look at the history of epistemology. There were single thinkers who already at the beginning of Western philosophy suspected that realism and its claim of objective knowledge were untenable. The sceptics have persistently denied such a possibility for more than two millennia. Most philosophers acknowledged the incontrovertibility of the sceptics’ arguments, but nevertheless went on hoping to find a path that would lead towards unquestionable truth about a real world. The paths they chose always led into the realms of metaphysics, that is to say, they tacitly implied some form of mystical belief.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32100560993308758819252":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1592815990299°
Innovationstyp Kritik an der traditionellen Erkenntnistheorie