Annotation:Annotationen:Problems of Knowledge and Cognizing Organisms/Z7f6ndn4vo

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Annotationen:Problems of Knowledge and Cognizing Organisms
Revision as of 15:52, 16 July 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Problems_of_Knowledge_and_Cognizing_Organisms |LastModificationDate=2020-07-16T16:52:43.669Z |LastModificationUser=U...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Annotationen:Problems_of_Knowledge_and_Cognizing_Organisms
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2020-07-16T16:52:43.669Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Z7f6ndn4vo","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ2Ӻ","endOffset":877°Ӻ,"quote":"What makes the dilemma so particularly awesome is its appearance of inevitability. Once we have instituted the senses as transmitters of “information” (no matter how we define that term), information that originates outside and ends up inside the perceiving organism, we simply cannot avoid asking just how good, how accurate, how reliable, or how “true” that information really is. Yet, the transmitting function of the senses seems an incontrovertible experiential fact, a fact that we find confirmed every time we observe a perceiving organism, be it a frog or a human. Thus it is not only easy to accept that basic arrangement of “objects,” “mediating senses,” and “percepts,” but it seems inevitable and unquestionable. The only way of escape may be to return to that point in our organization of experience when we first conceived of “perceiving organisms.”","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321050950766540853552":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1594911163463°