Annotation:Annotationen:Subitizing: The Role of Figural Patterns in the Development of Numerical Concepts/Vbldejo0k9
< Annotation:Annotationen:Subitizing: The Role of Figural Patterns in the Development of Numerical Concepts
Revision as of 14:00, 24 July 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Subitizing:_The_Role_of_Figural_Patterns_in_the_Development_of_Numerical_Concepts |LastModificationDate=2020-07-24T1...")
Annotation of | Annotationen:Subitizing:_The_Role_of_Figural_Patterns_in_the_Development_of_Numerical_Concepts |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2020-07-24T15:00:35.619Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Vbldejo0k9","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":1380°Ӻ,"quote":"In their classic work The Meaning of Meaning, Ogden and Richards (1946) drastically simplified that arrangement by compounding (and thus confounding) “concept” and “sound-image “at the apex of a triangle whose lower corners pointed at “referent” (object) and “symbol” (word) respectively. Strongly influenced by the rise of behaviorism they apparently were uneasy about “mental” constructs such as concepts and sound-images but they still felt the need to put the word “thought” at the apex of their triangle and it is certainly to their credit that they emphasized the fact that the direct connection between symbol and objective referent is an imagined or “purported” one. However, their simplification was an unfortunate step in the direction of radical Behaviorism, the school that later flourished and tried to eliminate thought altogether and to substitute a directly connected “stimulus” and “response” for symbols and referents. It has taken a long time to overcome this categorical elimination of mental operations and meaning, both in linguistics and in psychology. But now the general attitude has changed and we may once more adopt the view held at the beginning of the century when not only de Saussure but also Charles Peirce had realized that symbols and their referents could have no connection other than that formed in the minds of symbol users.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32100216984829210501442":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1595595635331°
|