Difference between revisions of "Annotation:Text:Die Radikal-Konstruktivistische Wissenstheorie/Q1hflthahs"

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{AntwortenGlasersfeld}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Die_Radikal-Konstruktivistische_Wissenstheorie |LastModificationDate=2020-01-30T09:41:18.610Z |LastModificationUse...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
|AnnotationOf=Text:Die_Radikal-Konstruktivistische_Wissenstheorie
 
|AnnotationOf=Text:Die_Radikal-Konstruktivistische_Wissenstheorie
|LastModificationDate=2020-01-30T09:41:18.610Z
+
|LastModificationDate=2020-01-30T09:43:09.034Z
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Q1hflthahs","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ389Ӻ","startOffset":691,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ389Ӻ","endOffset":1151°Ӻ,"quote":"That I have not forgotten the Statement that „action, not\nperception, is the key concept of an adequate theory ofkrtowl-\nedge“ ((8)) seems to me to be inherent in a number of things I\nsay. But FURTH is probably right: I should have explicitly\nmade it dear that I consider „perception“ not a passive re-\nceiving of data but an active construction on the pari of the\nperceiver. The Statement at the end of my first paragraph (EvG\n1) was obviously not sufficient.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32102414669047049782":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"AntwortGlasersfeld","data_creacio":1580373664046°
+
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Q1hflthahs","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ389Ӻ","startOffset":691,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ389Ӻ","endOffset":1151°Ӻ,"quote":"That I have not forgotten the Statement that „action, not\nperception, is the key concept of an adequate theory ofkrtowl-\nedge“ ((8)) seems to me to be inherent in a number of things I\nsay. But FURTH is probably right: I should have explicitly\nmade it dear that I consider „perception“ not a passive re-\nceiving of data but an active construction on the pari of the\nperceiver. The Statement at the end of my first paragraph (EvG\n1) was obviously not sufficient.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32102414669047049782":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"AntwortGlasersfeld","data_creacio":1580373664046°
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{ThemaFremd
 
{{ThemaFremd
 
|target_argumentation=Annotation:Text:Hans G. Furth – Not Radical enough: A critique of von Glasersfeld’s Radical Epistemology/Ldrsftuahu
 
|target_argumentation=Annotation:Text:Hans G. Furth – Not Radical enough: A critique of von Glasersfeld’s Radical Epistemology/Ldrsftuahu
|argument_relation=verträglich
+
|argument_relation=unterstützend
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:43, 30 January 2020

Annotation of Text:Die_Radikal-Konstruktivistische_Wissenstheorie
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2020-01-30T09:43:09.034Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Q1hflthahs","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ389Ӻ","startOffset":691,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ389Ӻ","endOffset":1151°Ӻ,"quote":"That I have not forgotten the Statement that „action, not\nperception, is the key concept of an adequate theory ofkrtowl-\nedge“ ((8)) seems to me to be inherent in a number of things I\nsay. But FURTH is probably right: I should have explicitly\nmade it dear that I consider „perception“ not a passive re-\nceiving of data but an active construction on the pari of the\nperceiver. The Statement at the end of my first paragraph (EvG\n1) was obviously not sufficient.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32102414669047049782":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"AntwortGlasersfeld","data_creacio":1580373664046°
Thema {{{field_text_autocomplete}}}Property "Ist Thema" (as page type) with input value "{{{field_text_autocomplete}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.
Bezieht sich auf Argumentation: Annotation:Text:Hans G. Furth – Not Radical enough: A critique of von Glasersfeld’s Radical Epistemology/Ldrsftuahu
Relation: unterstützend

Property "Thema" (as page type) with input value "{{{field_text_autocomplete}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.