Annotation:Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity
Revision as of 19:03, 24 July 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:Piaget’s_Legacy:_Cognition_as_Adaptive_Activity. ==Annotations== {{#ask: Category:TextAnnotation Annot...")
This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:Piaget’s_Legacy:_Cognition_as_Adaptive_Activity.
Annotations
| Annotation | AnnotationComment | LastModificationUser | LastModificationDate | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Cv7ksdu538 | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 11:56:27 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Eergdxo8a1 | Insofar as we remember these structures, we can recall them—and then they are Re-Presentations. I write this with a hyphen, to indicate that they are pieces of experience we have had and are now reviewing. They are not pieces of an external reality. | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 12:06:55 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Fqpckogfk5 | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 13:46:13 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Hgxr1muxkw | Sarah Oberbichler | 24 July 2019 20:03:35 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Is7gqnhdx9 | In other words, reality leaves sufficient room for them to work in our experiential world. | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 13:58:09 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Jqlgze4g1a | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 13:46:03 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/K3oyc0qges | One can therefore say: in perception, sensory signals call up a concept, in re-presentation, on the other hand, a concept calls up sensory impressions. In neither case is the experience caused by what philosophers want to call “reality”. | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 13:41:14 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/N5qqu4rffq | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 13:58:22 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Osb51lk0i4 | so, to have survived does not tell the biological organisms anything about the constraints they have not met, i.e., the constraints that eliminated those that could not survive. | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 13:45:12 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/P909p75702 | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 11:53:26 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Ryyj8qxme2 | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 11:56:14 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Smackij289 | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 12:07:03 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/U69ct8sl0q | According to the neurophysiologist’s model of the nervous system, it therefore appears that the discrimination of sensory modalities—seeing, hearing, touching, etc.—must be the result of the system’s own computation. From this perspective, then, whatever sensory structures, patterns, or images a living system compiles are its own construction, and the notion that they represent something that was there beforehand, has no empirical foundation. | Sarah Oberbichler | 24 July 2019 20:03:24 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Ubwx4s36q1 | You may, for example, dream that you are in a room, but all you see of the room is a door (perhaps because you expect someone to come in through it). You have no idea of the size of the room, and there are no windows, curtains, pictures, no ceiling or furniture, or anything else that usually characterizes a room. These items may come in later—as the plot of the dream develops— but at this point, they are irrelevant in your dream-presentation of a room. In contrast, your perception of a room starts from sensory impressions that you proceed to coordinate, and they then allow you to consider them compatible with your concept of “room”. | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 13:42:28 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/W0er5ff75u | The argument that our concepts, which we abstract from experience, cannot grasp anything that lies beyond our experiential interface, applies not only to the divine but also to any ontological reality posited as independent of the human experiencer. | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 11:53:17 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/W6kg6avstq | Compatibility, to repeat it once more, means no more and no less than to fit within constraints. Consequently, it seems to me that one of the most demanding tasks of A.I. would be the plausible simulation of an organism’s experience of social constraints | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 14:34:08 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Xck9vtaejc | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 13:42:36 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Xxbh7fsrb5 | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 14:34:21 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Xzttr85swp | We can visualize it with the help of a metaphor: the environment “selects” in the manner of a screen used to grade gravel: the screen admits what falls through and discards what does not. | Sarah Oberbichler | 26 July 2019 13:45:55 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
