Annotation:Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition
Revision as of 17:16, 6 December 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:Anticipation_in_the_Constructivist_Theory_of_Cognition. ==Annotations== {{#ask: Category:TextAnnotation ...")
This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:Anticipation_in_the_Constructivist_Theory_of_Cognition.
Annotations[edit]
Annotation | AnnotationComment | LastModificationUser | LastModificationDate | Category |
---|---|---|---|---|
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Boinfn2if1 | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 17:27:06 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/D87aoepwlz | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 17:17:04 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/E4dke75vc7 | The passage I quoted also indicates that there is more than one level of adaptation. On the sensorimotor level of perception and bodily action, it is avoidance of physical perturbation and the possibility of survival that matter. On the level of thought we are concerned with concepts, their connections, with theories and explanations. All these are only indirectly linked to the practice of living. On this higher level, viability is determined by the attainment of goals and the elimination of conceptual contradictions. | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 17:26:57 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Elrguxn0ti | The pattern of learning, however, is the same as in Piaget’s scheme theory, and once we impute to an organism the capability of reflecting upon its experiences, we can say that the principle of induction arises in its own thinking. | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 17:52:46 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Exghx797kw | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 18:08:10 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/H846yq7lyj | Without the conception of change there would be no use for the notion of causation. | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 December 2019 10:35:55 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/J8tzjlulb4 | All my decisions to carry out specific actions are based on the expectation that they will bring about a change towards the desired goal. | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 18:09:28 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Kez1488djx | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 17:52:33 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Kvc1m6pnqd | Sarah Oberbichler | 17 January 2020 18:43:45 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Omso6tefg9 | Let us look at the example more closely. I am thirsty, and there is a glass of water in front of me on the table. From past experience I have learned (by induction and abstraction) that water is a means to quench my thirst. This is the ‘voluntary purpose’ I have chosen at the moment. In other words, I am anticipating that water will do again what it did in the past. But to achieve my purpose, I have to drink the water. There, again, I am relying on past experience, in the sense that I carry out the ‘specific movements’ which I expect (anticipate) to bring the glass to my lips. It is these movements that are controlled and guided by negative feedback. When I reflect upon this sequence of decisions and actions, it becomes clear that the notion of causality plays an important role in the event. | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 18:08:50 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/P519c13mit | The use of a cause-effect link in order to bring about a change is based on the belief that, since the cause has produced its effect in the past, it will produce it in the future. | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 December 2019 12:03:03 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/S6xchbgg1w | Even in Aristotle’s day, bright people had noticed that those who regularly took some physical exercise such as walking, had a better chance of staying healthy. They had observed this often enough to consider it a reliable rule. Given that they had Olympic games and were interested in the performances of athletes, they probably also had some plausible theory of why exercise made one feel better. Consequently, they were confident in believing that going for walks was an efficient cause that had the effect of maintaining and even improving your health. People who felt that their physical fitness was deteriorating could, therefore, reasonably decide to use walking as a tool to bring about a beneficial change in their condition. | Sarah Oberbichler | 17 January 2020 18:44:11 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Sdo9pndh63 | Anyway, the more sophisticated view of the reflex enabled Piaget to take the tripartite pattern of perceived situation, action, and result as the basis for what he called ‘Action Scheme’. It provided a powerful model for a form of practical learning on the sensorimotor level that was the same, in principle, for animals and humans. Studies of animal behavior had shown that even the most primitive organisms tend to move towards situations that in the past provided agreeable experiences rather than towards those that proved unpleasant or painful. | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 17:47:08 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Sv6u23dqzm | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 December 2019 10:36:06 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/T3wyw2ffcp | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 17:47:17 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Uox21p9i32 | To believe that the future affects the present is no doubt a superstition, but to declare that purpose and goal-directed action must be discarded because they are teleological notions is no better. It shows an abysmal ignorance of the difference between empirical and metaphysical teleology. | Sarah Oberbichler | 17 January 2020 18:43:08 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Uvkospj4ha | If you consider that in the context of the Darwinian theory of evolution, “to be adapted” means to survive by avoiding constraints, it becomes clear that, for Piaget, “to know” does not involve acquiring a picture of the world around us. Instead, it concerns the discovery of paths of action and of thought that are open to us, paths that are viable in the face of experience. | Sarah Oberbichler | 6 December 2019 17:16:53 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/Vnpn68pmsh | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 December 2019 12:02:50 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 |