Annotation:Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism
This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism.
Annotations
| Annotation | AnnotationComment | LastModificationUser | LastModificationDate | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/D4a5o8h3yn | Epistemology thus becomes the study of how the mind operates, of the ways and means it employs to construct a relatively regular world out of the flow of its experience. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:07:26 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/D8ioavey6m | Two eggs may be considered the same because of their shape, size, or color, or because they come from the same hen; but there will be a pungent difference between them if one was laid yesterday and the other six weeks ago. A fieldmouse and an elephant are different in many ways, but they will be considered the same whenever we want to distinguish mammals from other animals. Finally, all eggs, all animals, and indeed all objects that I have ever seen or imagined, are the same in that one respect that I have isolated them as bounded, unitary objects in the total field of my experience. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:11:02 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Dplt7s04u8 | A similar, often cited example, is the movie film which, depending on the conditions of perception, we see as a sequence of individually different images or as one continuously moving image. Irrespective of any “real” horse that may or may not have trotted somewhere at some time and been filmed while doing so, when the film is presented to us, we ourselves must construct the motion by constituting a continuous change of one horse from the succession of images. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:12:17 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Ejuf8dv6qw | Just a the environment places constraints on the living organism (biological structures) and eliminates all variants that in some way transgress the limits within which they are possible or “viable,” so the experiential world, be it that of everyday life or of the laboratory, constitutes the testing ground for our ideas (cognitive structures). | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 11:56:30 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Gv8fsjs8m9 | The only aspect of that “real” world that actually enters into the realm of experience, are its constraints; | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:03:10 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Hr46f5ns5g | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:08:46 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Hu8t7ivxxd | The question is unanswerable, because no matter what we do, we can check our perceptions only by means of other perceptions, but never with the apple as it might be before we perceive it. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:04:22 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/J5co3p0yi1 | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 11:55:36 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Jcx3h525gq | Sameness, however, as we have seen, is always relative: Objects, and experiences in general, are the “same” with respect to the properties or components that have been checked in a comparison. Hence, an experience that consists, for instance, of the elements a, b, and c, can be considered the same as an experience consisting of a, b, c, and x, as long as x is not taken into account. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:10:01 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Jscl4gi3cs | because the success of a key does not depend on finding a lock into which it might fit, but solely on whether or not it opens the way to the particular goal we want to reach. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:08:22 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Lxhbugq5yp | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:05:32 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Mulzzgf0vh | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:12:35 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/N9ris827xd | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:09:21 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Nnvl495h6o | In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:05:18 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Oj53uotm4g | “natural selection” does not in any positive sense select the fittest, the sturdiest, the best, or the truest, but it functions negatively, in that it simply lets go under whatever does not pass the test. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 11:58:43 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Pet52dftig | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 11:56:40 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Pkei38jxuj | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 11:58:52 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Plr2bjld4g | No one uses these conceptual possibilities more skillfully than the professional magician. During a performance he may, for instance, request a spectator’s ring, toss another ring across the room to his assistant, and then let the stunned spectator find his ring in his own coat pocket. The magic consists in directing the spectators’ perception in such a way that they unwittingly construct an individual identity between the first experience of the ring and the experience of the thrown object. Once that has been done, it would, indeed, require magic to transfer the ring from the assistant to the spectator’s pocket. Another case is that of the red ribbon which the magician cuts into little pieces and then – literally with a flick of his hand – produces once more as one whole piece. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:11:33 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Rzvf82meai | Hence, the environment can, at best, be held responsible for extinction, but never for survival. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:02:19 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Siqwoam8h1 | either a species fits its environment (including the other species), or it does not; i.e., it either survives, or it dies out. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 11:54:07 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Snada3v81n | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:12:24 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Tcbgm4w3tr | A key fits if it opens the lock. The fit describes a capacity of the key, not of the lock. Thanks to professional burglars, we know only too well that there are many keys that are shaped quite differently from ours but nevertheless unlock our doors. The metaphor is crude, but it serves quite well to bring into relief the difference I want to explicate. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 11:55:15 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Ub3689yii4 | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 11:55:26 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Wa0fcv6npz | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:07:39 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Wejx8rywia | Quite generally, that means that the world which we experience is, and must be as it is, because we have put it together that way. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:06:31 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Wjaxx1wuhk | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:06:55 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Ws2ok1u2g3 | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:03:44 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Yuqkts2gic | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:04:36 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Zrmagm8yfp | The products of conscious cognitive activity, therefore, always have a purpose and are, at least originally, assessed according to how well they serve that purpose. | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:09:08 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Ztzeq1fx2d | Sarah Oberbichler | 23 July 2019 12:02:31 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 |
