Annotation:Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking

This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking.

Annotations

Annotation	AnnotationComment	LastModificationUser	LastModificationDate	Category
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Cjp7hddniy		Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:23:09	TextAnnotation Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Ef3tssha25	What we call “knowledge”, then, is the map of paths of action and thought which, at that moment in the course of our experience, have turned out to be viable for us.	Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 17:41:16	TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Er0iabn9hc	Without going into the details of the process that links the experience of a thing with the experience of a word, it should be clear that both these items are composed of elements that are part of the acting subject’s experiential world and are, therefore, determined by what the subject attends to and how the subject perceives and conceives it.	Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:30:53	TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Fy4315bj08	That is to say, the proponents of a theory will assimilate new experiences as long as they possibly can, even in the face of considerable perturbations.	Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 16:15:01	TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Ggfynwin3d	To be adapted, therefore, means no more and no less than to be viable.	Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:23:00	TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Iar0damzs0		Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:27:10	TextAnnotation Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Jilmbioysq		Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 19:31:07	TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Kmtzjqdbph		Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 19:30:53	TextAnnotation Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Mdk3s7g2eq	In fact, the process of accommodation and adaptation of the meaning of words and linguistic expressions continues for each of us throughout our lives, and no matter how long we have spoken the language, there will still be occasions when we experience a perturbation and realize that we have been using a word in a way that turns out to be idiosyncratic in some particular respect.	Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:33:43	TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Mkwgldjnzq	Finally, it must be made clear that, while biologists may tend to think of viability and adaptedness in terms of differential reproduction, in the cognitive domain the two terms refer to the achievement and maintenance of internal equilibrium. For the constructivist, therefore, Knowledge has the function of eliminating perturbations; and the higher we move in the hierarchy of conceptual abstractions, the more the perturbations tend to be conceptual rather than material. This, obviously, is one of the features that make the constructivist approach interesting for therapists.	Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:25:27	TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/O4xnxyeby8		Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 16:15:48	TextAnnotation Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Onvo8k214n	Solutions, from the constructivist perspective, are always relative — and this, in turn, makes clear that problems are not entities that lie about in the universe, independent of any experiencer. Instead, problems arise when obstacles block the way to a subject’s goal.	Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:27:00	TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Pp2o1bfp77	When the nail that holds up the wire to my computer falls out of the wall in my study and I use my shoe to hammer it in again, I am deliberately assimilating the shoe to the function of a hammer. It may work, or it may not, but even if it does work I am not led to believe that the shoe is a hammer. In contrast, a child that has just begun to associate two or three visual characteristics, such as four legs, a tail, and fur, with utterances of the word “dog”, may well utter that word when a new visual experience allows her to see these three characteristics. A psychologist who witnesses this, may smile and say: “Ah, you see, she assimilates the lamb to her concept of dog!” He will be quite right, of course, in making this assessment; but he will be wrong if he believes that the child’s utterance requires some special activity that is called “assimilation”. From the child’s point of view, given her criteria for using the word “dog”, the lamb is a dog, and she has no reason to modify her categorization until some unexpected event creates a perturbation. Only when the new item behaves in a way that seems undog-like to her, or when someone says “No, dear, this is a lamb”, will the child have occasion to accommodate, i.e., to look for a distinguishing characteristic and, if one can be found, to create a new conceptual category called “lamb”.	Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 16:15:37	TextAnnotation Beispiel3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Ut6e3qcx0c		Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 17:41:28	TextAnnotation Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Vydb681cko		Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:30:39	TextAnnotation Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Z68fuipj6p		Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:33:53	TextAnnotation Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Zq5wuk01z0		Sarah Oberbichler	27 January 2020 18:25:42	TextAnnotation Prämisse3