Annotation:Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior
This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior.
Annotations[edit]
| Annotation | AnnotationComment | LastModificationUser | LastModificationDate | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Amwchzrvs6 | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:46:17 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Cd0zqv2h8p | Sarah Oberbichler | 5 September 2019 20:26:03 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Cd6ty5fmwl | In other words, what the observer calls an “object”, is for the organism an inseparable component of an activity cluster. Nevertheless, at this point the stage is set for a momentous step that opens the way to a new kind of operation. No doubt, this step, like every other in the process of evolution, is fostered by the selective pressure of the environment; but for the functioning of the organism, it constitutes a discrete novelty like the opening of a new pathway in its processor. | Sarah Oberbichler | 5 September 2019 20:36:22 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Cl29d1aelt | According to the view I am proposing, communicatory behavior is a mode of action, its function is to link concerted activity, and it is indispensable because without these links there could be no unified social action. Thus it is an instrument which is to say, a tool. | Sarah Oberbichler | 5 September 2019 20:55:41 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Czsf2vocq1 | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:45:34 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Dgl2izac2e | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:42:22 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Esr9lmv70f | Sarah Oberbichler | 5 September 2019 20:35:50 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/F08y4pwjx1 | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:41:18 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Ghr46dbvan | Sarah Oberbichler | 24 July 2019 15:30:07 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Gmcni8malx | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:40:13 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Gr00sh3bq8 | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:56:13 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/H8yupxi8ol | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:44:13 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Jl6eclme97 | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:41:30 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Jnn3h8oxj3 | For induction, whether it is conscious in the form of a conclusion we draw, or unconscious in the form of a behavior that becomes established because of its success, springs always from the same root: a more or less regular recurrence in past experience. | Sarah Oberbichler | 5 September 2019 20:26:31 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Joziuyyrdi | It is in this sense that communication must be considered “instrumental”, “goal-directed”, and therefore “purposive”. | Sarah Oberbichler | 24 July 2019 15:28:35 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Ng9s5jnij1 | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:43:11 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/O84tai4f45 | Sarah Oberbichler | 24 July 2019 15:27:59 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Or2x9i9elr | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:46:02 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Or476gfo78 | In order to become a reference item, the object has to be cut loose from its original context where it was a more or less relevant sensory adjunct to an activity cluster, and it must become something very like a “representation”. | Sarah Oberbichler | 5 September 2019 20:43:31 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Q0dvboq55f | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:40:53 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Qul1em1cg1 | Sarah Oberbichler | 24 July 2019 15:31:21 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/V00v2qclrd | To sum up this discussion of linguistic communication, I would suggest three criteria to distinguish ‘‘language’’, all of which are necessary but individually insufficient:
There must be a set (lexicon) of communicatory signs, i.e., perceptual items whose meaningfulness (SEMANTICITY) is constituted by a conventional tie (semantic nexus) and not by an inferential one. These signs must be symbols, i.e., linked to representations (SYMBOLICITY) therefore they can be sent without reference to perceptual instances of the items they designate, and received without “triggering” a behavioral response in the receiver. As symbols they merely activate the connected representation. There must be a set of rules (GRAMMAR) governing the combination of signs into strings such that certain combinations produce a new semantic content in addition to the individual content of the component signs. | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:55:54 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/X4dzilz2c8 | Sarah Oberbichler | 9 September 2019 22:44:01 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 | |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Xixfrqskqo | To begin, we may say that there could hardly have been an evolution of speech, or language, if there had not been an origin. | Sarah Oberbichler | 24 July 2019 15:27:35 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
| Annotationen:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Zjiavvwbig | An activity, thus, will be called “purposive” if it serves to reduce or eliminate the discrepancy (negative feedback) between the value of a sensory signal and the reference value in such a “teleological” unit. | Sarah Oberbichler | 24 July 2019 15:31:07 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
