Annotation:Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit

From DigiVis
Revision as of 12:48, 5 September 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:Knowledge_as_Environmental_Fit. ==Annotations== {{#ask: Category:TextAnnotation Annotation of::{{PAGENAM...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:Knowledge_as_Environmental_Fit.

Annotations[edit]

AnnotationAnnotationCommentLastModificationUserLastModificationDateCategory
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/A3gehx9eomSarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 11:40:18TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Ab8fb8wrqdFrom the radical constructivist perspective, “knowledge” fits reality in much the same way that a key fits a lock that it is able to open. The fit describes a capacity of the key, not a property of the lock. When we face a novel problem, we are in much the same position as the burglar who wishes to enter a house. The “key” with which he successfully opens the door might be a paper clip, a bobby pin, a credit card, or a skillfully crafted skeleton key. All that matters is that it fits within the constraints of the particular lock and allows the burglar to get in.Sarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 14:25:19TextAnnotation
Beispiel3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Brsz38tooaKnowledge, thus, is usually assumed to be knowledge of the environment.Sarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 13:49:25TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Cczrua7jszPyrrho and his followers had successfully argued that if, say, an apple appears to have a certain color and a certain smell, feels smooth and tastes sweet to us, this cannot give us the knowledge that a real apple possesses these properties, because we have no way of examining the apple other than by seeing, smelling, tasting, and feeling it again.Sarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 15:11:23TextAnnotation
Beispiel3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/E6sb79yrl9Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 13:15:49TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Ejwmc719nvSarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:33:24TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Eku7n1qmirFor constructivists, then, studying the genesis of the concepts that allow us to organize our experience is not a sin but a necessity; and the way in which that genesis will be studied should undoubtedly be part of psychology, even if the psychological establishment, with the exception of Piaget and his Geneva School, has hitherto not done very much in that direction.Sarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 14:16:44TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Eyxb6dpfztIt is analogous to asking, say, what the magnification of a telescope might be if nothing that is seen through the telescope can be seen or measured in any other way.Sarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 14:56:47TextAnnotation
Beispiel3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/F0mf2bs6rsIn other words, we cannot help realizing that our experience is subject to constraints that are altogether outside our control.Sarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 11:40:02TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/F3mnmypox8Hence, if our senses distort what they are supposed to “convey,” we have no way of ever discovering that distortion.Sarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 15:11:05TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Ffnlniggh4The radical constructivist, therefore, must not be thought to do away with “objectivity”—he merely defines it in a different way. Any concept, event, theory, or model will be considered “objective” if and only if it has proved to be viable not only in one’s own organization of the experiential world, but also in the particular area of conceptual organization that proves to be a viable model for the experiential worlds one imputes to others.Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 13:18:45TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Gbzvf7r4p3Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 13:17:46TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Hi9cganhtqBut success is relative.Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:23:48TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Hmjh45r7cwSarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 14:46:51TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/I1w826em8pPyrrho, a little later, formulated the argument that quickly became and still remains the cornerstone of all kinds of philosophical scepticism. How, he asked, could we ever tell whether or not the pictures our senses “convey” are accurate and true, if the only way they can be checked is again through our senses? The question is, indeed, unanswerable.Sarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 14:56:12TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/J3jyk1t96tGiven this central notion of fit, the radical constructivist theory of knowledge is essentially a cybernetic theory in that it is based on the principle of adaptation to constraints rather than the principle of causation.Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 11:56:48TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Jdh09uhq7qSarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 11:51:55TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Jnnmb88m6nSarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 14:17:00TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Jvbbgirs3vThat notion, in fact, is no less an ontological assumption than the realist’s assumption that the experiencer-independent ontic reality should have a knowable structure. The character of experiential reality will have to be explained, not as a result of preordained ways of experiencing (Kant’s Anschauungsformen), but as a result of the experiencer’s coordinatory and conceptual operations.Sarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 11:51:45TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Ktc0nqsv6vSarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 13:49:13TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Lfb2ivc9y9Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:44:58TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Ny31x2tjefThe self, thus, is an experiential entity to which the experiencer attributes a number of specific properties, abilities, and functions.Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 13:16:10TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Pwm7rstw3nSarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:26:36TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Qed6j4r3noSarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 14:56:26TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Qgvba1vpvsThis viability is, in principle, the same notion as in the case of the lock and the key.Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:40:38TextAnnotation
Beispiel3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Qrotb6l2mkSarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 13:01:10TextAnnotation
Beispiel3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Sjxnqjl80zSarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 11:57:02TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Surd3zzg2qSarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:44:11TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/T61nx065ujSarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 14:44:12TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/U9eyvg69g4Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:03:08TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Umj2wwlxyn“Knowledge” and the process of cognizing are therefore seen as inseparable. They reciprocally entail one another in the same way as drawing a “figure” entails categorizing the sheet of paper as “ground.” Knowledge, thus, becomes the product of an active, constructive mind.Sarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 12:02:57TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Uy3uq0r6siSarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 15:11:40TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Uyivvznp0tSarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 15:12:00TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Vz9cv6boaeThe scenario, in which the knower is supposed to acquire “true” pictures or representations of the real world, is thus inherently unsatisfactory. If the knower can never be sure that the picture of the world which he or she distills from experience is unquestionably a correct representation of a world that exists as such, the knower is cast in the role of a discoverer who has no possible access to what he or she is expected to discover.Sarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 15:12:19TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Wlxe83d61pSarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 14:25:36TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/X3553l47nwSimilarly, the problem-solver attempts to conceive a method that will successfully open a path to his or her goal. Any method that does this will serve as well as any other, and to the extent that the problem-solver is successful, his or her know-how is functionally adapted to the constraints of unknowable ontic reality. Note that considerations as to how well a method serves its purpose are secondary in that they require reflection on what has been done as well as the introduction of ulterior values, such as speed, economy, ease of execution, compatibility with the methods used for other problems, etc.Sarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 14:26:06TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/X7bfcmsiirIn other words, one takes for granted that what one has come to know had its own independent existence before one captured it by a cognizing effort. Given that perspective, it is indeed difficult to avoid asking just how well the knowledge one has acquired “corresponds to,” “depicts,” or “represents” what it is supposed to correspond to, depict, or represent, namely Reality.Sarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 14:46:39TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Y8edpp9u4pKnowledge, therefore, was knowledge of the things that caused one’s experiences, the things that were given, the data, and it could all be put together as a picture of Reality.Sarah Oberbichler5 September 2019 14:43:54TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Yabi7ix5fkIt is the same trick that the statistician performs quite openly: when something has recurred a sufficient number of times, it is considered “significant”—which is to say, it is considered probable enough to be taken as a “fact.” The good statistician, of course, does not forget that it was he or she who decided the level of recurrence beyond which things were to be considered “significant.” Like the good modern physicist, he does not argue that, just because the sun has risen every morning for as long as we can remember or have records, we have the right to assume that it must continue to do so in the future. With David Hume, they know that there is no conceivable logical reason why the future should resemble the past. But, for practical reasons, we tend to assume that it will. If we did not make that assumption, we could not draw any inferences at all from past experience, and our attempts at predicting and controlling future experience could not even get started.Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:26:28TextAnnotation
Beispiel3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Yl52hc16ekSarah Oberbichler13 September 2019 12:03:09TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Yy3ckpwl6pSarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:44:47TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Z5oo5zzrj0First of all, it is important to realize that there are several levels of reality that differ largely in the material that is used to construct the items that are then considered “real.”Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:59:44TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Zom8a1siz5In the cognitive realm of conceptual structures, then, the concept of viability applies to those structures which, in the cognizing organism’s past experience, have led to success.Sarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:04:31TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:Knowledge as Environmental Fit/Zoptl909rkSarah Oberbichler20 September 2019 12:33:04TextAnnotation
Prämisse3