Annotation:Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation
Revision as of 20:39, 30 September 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:On_the_Concept_of_Interpretation. ==Annotations== {{#ask: Category:TextAnnotation Annotation of::{{PAGEN...")
This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:On_the_Concept_of_Interpretation.
Annotations
Annotation | AnnotationComment | LastModificationUser | LastModificationDate | Category |
---|---|---|---|---|
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Bztlk6sifh | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 17:36:10 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/C2rcic5sas | To interpret an utterance or a written piece of language (be it a message or a text) requires something more than the construction of its conventional linguistic meaning. In fact, to interpret an utterance requires the insertion of whatever we consider its conventional meaning into a specific experiential context. | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 18:10:18 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/F1qdus5sab | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 18:10:49 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/F30e9rvdp0 | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 17:46:53 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Fcz3ufxxay | Sarah Oberbichler | 14 October 2019 10:49:53 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Go8jrkwg07 | The viability of an interpretation, after all, can be assessed only from the interpreter’s point of view. | Sarah Oberbichler | 14 October 2019 11:15:46 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Hhh1jxh2ki | If I am told that a mermaid is a creature with a woman’s head and torso and the tail of a fish, I need not have met such a creature in actual experience to understand the word, but I must be somewhat familiar with what is called “woman” and what is called “fish” to construct a meaning for the novel word. And if I am not told that the fish’s tail replaces the woman’s legs, I may construct a notion that is more like a fish-tailed biped than like the intended traditional mermaid. My deviant notion could then be corrected only by further interaction, i.e., by getting into situations where my conception of a creature with legs as well as a fish’s tail comes into explicit conflict with a picture or with what speakers of the language say about mermaids. | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 17:40:06 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Iw7yv8nvtb | Any prediction based on the interpretation of an experiential item that is taken as a sign pointing to a not yet experienced item, will be judged according to whether it is or is not confirmed by actual subsequent experience. | Sarah Oberbichler | 30 September 2019 21:50:27 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Ji0byrkvz3 | a linguistic message, under any circumstances, can be interpreted only in terms of the receiver’s experience. | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 17:34:34 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/K7bu7i5fc9 | Sarah Oberbichler | 30 September 2019 21:39:18 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Kwdz4yohqd | I submit that whatever one might choose as the measure of justification, plausibility, or correctness when one is concerned with literary interpretation lies beyond the realm of linguistic competence (which is taken for granted as prerequisite) and involves relations one establishes between the conceptual structures called forth by the text and the conceptual network that constitutes one’s own experiential world. These relations, by definition, are subjective, in the sense that they cannot connect anything but the reader’s own conceptual structures with the reader’s own experiential world. | Sarah Oberbichler | 14 October 2019 10:49:41 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Mj3dyoro8x | Sarah Oberbichler | 30 September 2019 21:59:47 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/P2mzyf0zj1 | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 17:39:57 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/P7byiq9npw | and again, any such adaptation and abstraction must be based on the individual construction of patterns of concepts and actions which turn out to be compatible with actions and reactions of other users of the language. | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 18:13:23 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/R7567lqgvd | Sarah Oberbichler | 30 September 2019 22:00:08 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Rpj5obhbh1 | It is important to realize that the compatibility of two items does not entail their identity. | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 17:46:44 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/T2bkra3vhl | Sarah Oberbichler | 14 October 2019 11:29:34 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/U2h79k3m8t | At the beginning of the 18th century, Giambattista Vico formulated a constructivist epistemology by saying that humans can know only what humans can construct. | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 17:40:45 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Uxqiv7jqtz | “Shut the door!,” for instance, must be responded to with a sequence of motor acts which has to be learned in a succession of experiential situations, a succession which provides occasion for the acquisition of simple but nevertheless specific skills and, above all, occasion to experience what has to be avoided. Most of us have been scolded at one time or another for slamming a door when the instruction was to shut it. | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 17:35:55 | TextAnnotation Beispiel3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Vbc2v9q2n8 | Sarah Oberbichler | 14 October 2019 10:48:39 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Wf0rr6vccx | Compatibility is a matter of avoiding clash, passing between obstacles, fitting into space that is not encumbered by the conditions that have to be complied with. | Sarah Oberbichler | 30 September 2019 21:39:11 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Wxfdne05o1 | Sarah Oberbichler | 14 October 2019 11:15:28 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/X30bxs5up8 | The constraints within which it attempts to achieve viability are set by the text alone and not by any external area of experience. Hence, the quest for the interpretation of a text turns out to be a futile undertaking. | Sarah Oberbichler | 14 October 2019 11:26:36 | TextAnnotation Schlussfolgerung3 |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Xpt1bhq27p | Sarah Oberbichler | 1 October 2019 17:36:05 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 | |
Annotationen:On the Concept of Interpretation/Xs06lyaurq | Sarah Oberbichler | 30 September 2019 21:50:33 | TextAnnotation Prämisse3 |